Skip to content

Adjust service response data example #2855

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

Adjust service response data example #2855

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2025

Conversation

@emontnemery
Copy link
Contributor

@emontnemery emontnemery commented Nov 4, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Proposed change

Adjust service response data example to register the service in the integration's async_setup instead of from a platform's async_setup_entry

Type of change

  • Document existing features within Home Assistant
  • Document new or changing features for which there is an existing pull request elsewhere
  • Spelling or grammatical corrections, or rewording for improved clarity
  • Changes to the backend of this documentation
  • Remove stale or deprecated documentation

Checklist

  • I have read and followed the documentation guidelines.
  • I have verified that my changes render correctly in the documentation.

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • Link to relevant existing code or pull request:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated developer documentation for integration setup with revised method signatures and refreshed initialization guidance.

@emontnemery emontnemery mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Draft
19 tasks
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation update to the developer guide example for integration setup. The method signature example is changed from async_setup_entry to async_setup, updating the function parameters and shifting the docstring from "Set up the platform" to "Set up the integration."

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Example Update
docs/dev_101_services.md		 Method signature in example changed from async_setup_entry(hass, entry: ConfigEntry) -> bool to async_setup(hass, config: ConfigType) -> bool. Docstring updated from "Set up the platform." to "Set up the integration."

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Adjust service response data example' is vague and doesn't clearly convey that the main change involves replacing async_setup_entry with async_setup as the initialization entry point. Consider a more specific title like 'Update service response example to use async_setup instead of async_setup_entry' to better communicate the actual scope of changes.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description provides a clear proposed change and correctly identifies the type of change, but the Additional information section lacks required links to relevant code or pull requests that would justify this documentation adjustment.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch adjust_service_response_example
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4c0241 and c5d876f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/dev_101_services.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
*/**(html|markdown|md)

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

*/**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

  • Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

*/**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

  • If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

  • Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

  • Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

do not comment on HTML used for icons

Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Files:

  • docs/dev_101_services.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - developers-home-assistant
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - developers-home-assistant
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - developers-home-assistant
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/dev_101_services.md (1)

312-313: Example correctly updated to demonstrate integration-level service registration.

The function signature and docstring have been appropriately updated to async_setup with "Set up the integration." This aligns with the guidance on line 8, which specifies that services should be registered in the integration's async_setup, not in async_setup_entry. The updated example now correctly demonstrates the recommended approach.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@abmantis abmantis merged commit e36ba8e into master Nov 4, 2025
5 checks passed
@abmantis abmantis deleted the adjust_service_response_example branch November 4, 2025 22:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@abmantis abmantis abmantis approved these changes

@gjohansson-ST gjohansson-ST gjohansson-ST approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@emontnemery @abmantis @gjohansson-ST